Polls find declining national pride, but their questions measure different things

AP-NORC and Gallup found weaker pride on different questions in 2026. Wording, response categories and sample sizes determine which comparisons are meaningful.

Lauren Mercer·

Published

·1 min read
Illustration of two survey sheets, a pencil and a United States flag.
AI-generated illustration.

The AP-NORC findings

AP-NORC’s America 250 poll reported that high pride in how U.S. democracy works fell from 42% in 2017 to 28% in 2026. Pride in U.S. history declined from 58% to 44% on the same comparison. These are responses to particular questions about institutions and national attributes, rather than a single measure of patriotism.

Sources: AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research [1]

A related but different survey

Gallup separately reported a low in its long-running national-pride series using a June 1–15 survey. That survey asks about pride in being American. Its findings can add context, but percentages from the two organizations should not be combined as if they came from an identical question and sample.

Sources: Gallup [2]

What the results can support

A change over time is most informative when question wording and response categories are comparable. Check the methods and subgroup sample sizes before making claims about a generation or party. The surveys measure reported attitudes; they do not identify a single cause for the change or prove how respondents will vote. Differences by political affiliation are also a reason to avoid describing all Americans as holding one view.

Sources & References

Verified Sources

The factual claims in this article are supported by the following primary and secondary sources:

  1. America 250 poll, results and methodology
    AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research · Original survey results and links to methods and toplines. · Accessed 2026-09-09
  2. American pride falls to a 25-year record low
    Gallup · Separate national-pride series, published June 29. · Accessed 2026-09-09
Factual inaccuracy or broken reference?Submit a correction →
LM
Written By

Lauren Mercer

Senior International Affairs & Geopolitical Correspondent • 15+ years in international policy journalism and geopolitical risk advisory.

Lauren Mercer analyzes cross-border trade policy, diplomatic statecraft, international regulatory frameworks, and macroeconomic geopolitical shifts.

Topic Cluster Architecture

Related Intelligence & Strategic Coverage

5 Recommended Analyses

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *